Filed under: brave new world, the sweet life | Tags: city, city life, fear, suburb, sustainability, urbanism, white flight
Last week I had an argument with a friend about the skating rinks in Manhattan. She argued that the ‘market should decide’ what we pay for the rinks, and I argued – a bit forcefully, I guess – that the rinks should be made accessible to a broad public which could involve the market but also other decision making bodies. It ended badly and COFRB “The Chairman” Greenspan’s name was taken in vain.
It is patently absurd that something that doesn’t care be made an oracle that we consult and beseech and yea verily believe in. Market truth is an ideology that is particularly unyielding and unhelpful when it comes to how we build and live in cities. The city, like a lover, needs more than mere assertions of truth: without nuance and care the deal goes south in a hurry.
In the excerpt below, from the essay Confronting Fear by Sophie Body-Gendrot, is a discussion of how fear is a cancer to the proper public use of the city. In imagery reminiscent of a witch trial – only on the other side – Body-Gendrot tells us we need to drag fear and rumour into the public square and reveal their intransigence and wrongheadedness. Fear has lead to flight and sprawl, and sprawl destroys the city, and the people who partake should be taxed. Now that’s a daring statement, and one of the few that is worth listening to in the clang and din rising from the prophets and hawkers of the new sustainability.
Here is the excerpt:
It is our task as urban scholars to deconstruct such elusive terms as unsafety, urban violence, disorder, community and ‘sensitization to violence.’ It cannot be denied that crime and terrorism are urban threats in our time. There is a before and after 9/11, with global repercussions. Yet the answer to fear is not to escape from the city, buy a gun and shelter ina gated community. It is an illusion to think that families, their children, and their grandchildren can live safely for ever after in a bunker, dismissing the outside world. Because the city is a historical construct, what they miss is the overlapping and intersecting urbanisms, each representing different historical moments and existing simultaneously. Parks, riversides, shopping centres, museums and shared collective moments of celebration illustrate the vitality of cities. Fears and rumours about crime that undermine the use of public space should be selected, confronted and addressed in public debate. The debate about sprawl is open: according to Anne Power and Richard Rogers, the harm it produces to the city should be officially acknowledged and higher taxes should be implemented for those whose lifestyle destroys the urban core.
Leave a Comment so far
Leave a comment